Skip to content
Governance

Protocol governance for institutional trust

The KIFP governance framework establishes the authority model, admission criteria, and decision-making processes that ensure every participant in the federation operates under verifiable, enforceable standards. Governance is not advisory. It is structural.

Root Authority model

A Root Authority is the foundational trust anchor within a KIFP deployment. Each Root Authority owns its key hierarchy, controls its credential issuance policies, and bears full accountability for every identity assertion made under its trust domain. There is no implicit trust. Authority is earned through a formal admission process and maintained through continuous compliance.

Root admission process

1

Application submission

Prospective Root Authority submits a formal application including organizational identity, technical infrastructure documentation, and intended deployment scope.

2

Technical conformance review

KeyIdentity engineering validates the applicant's infrastructure against KIFP protocol requirements, including HSM configuration, key hierarchy implementation, and API conformance.

3

Independent security audit

A qualified third-party auditor conducts a security assessment of the applicant's deployment environment, covering penetration testing, key management practices, and operational security controls.

4

Governance agreement execution

The applicant executes the Root Authority Governance Agreement, binding them to protocol compliance obligations, incident reporting requirements, and audit cooperation terms.

5

Tier assignment

Based on the applicant's deployment model and federation requirements, a federation tier is assigned that defines the scope of interoperability and trust delegation rights.

6

Registry publication

The new Root Authority's public key material and federation metadata are published to the KIFP Trust Registry, making it discoverable and verifiable by other participants.

Federation tiers

The KIFP protocol defines three federation tiers, each with progressively broader interoperability scope and correspondingly stricter governance requirements.

Tier 1

Sovereign

Single-root isolated deployment. The Root Authority operates independently with no cross-root trust delegation. All identity binding and authorization decisions remain within a single trust domain.

Requirements

  • Dedicated HSM infrastructure
  • Independent key hierarchy
  • KIFP protocol conformance
  • Annual security audit
Tier 2

Bilateral

Pairwise trust agreements between two Root Authorities. Each bilateral relationship is governed by a specific trust agreement defining the scope of credential acceptance and authorization delegation.

Requirements

  • All Tier 1 requirements
  • Bilateral trust agreement per counterparty
  • Cross-root audit trail synchronization
  • Incident notification within 4 hours
Tier 3

Federated

Full federation with cross-root FIA exchange. Root Authorities participate in a multilateral trust framework enabling seamless credential verification across all federated members.

Requirements

  • All Tier 2 requirements
  • Trust Council membership
  • Real-time revocation propagation
  • Quarterly conformance attestation

Governance roadmap

Governance authority transitions from centralized stewardship to multi-stakeholder council governance in three defined phases.

Phase 1Current

Sole governance authority

KeyIdentity operates as the sole governance authority for the KIFP protocol. All Root Authority admissions, tier assignments, and protocol changes are administered directly by KeyIdentity. This centralized model ensures rapid iteration on governance processes while the protocol matures and the initial Root Authority cohort is established.

Phase 2Planned

Trust Council formation

A multi-stakeholder Trust Council is formed with representation from Root Authority operators, independent security auditors, and regulatory observers. The Council assumes shared governance authority over protocol changes and Root Authority admissions. KeyIdentity retains a veto right during the transition period to ensure protocol integrity.

Phase 3Target State

Full Council governance

The Trust Council operates as the primary governance body for the KIFP protocol. KeyIdentity participates as a contributing member with equal standing. Protocol changes, admission decisions, and enforcement actions require Council quorum. No single member holds unilateral authority.

Trust Council evolution

The Trust Council is the target governance body for the KIFP protocol. Its composition, voting model, and decision-making processes are designed to balance operational efficiency with broad stakeholder representation.

Root Authority operators

Elected representatives from active Root Authority deployments. Each Tier 3 Root Authority is entitled to one seat. Tier 2 Root Authorities share rotating representation. Seats carry full voting rights on protocol changes and admission decisions.

Independent security auditors

Representatives from qualified third-party security firms that perform Root Authority assessments. Auditor seats carry voting rights on security-related protocol changes and advisory rights on all other matters.

Regulatory observers

Non-voting observer seats available to regulatory bodies and standards organizations. Observers may submit formal comments on proposed protocol changes and participate in public deliberation sessions.

Voting model

Protocol changes require a two-thirds supermajority of voting members. Security-critical changes require unanimous consent from all Root Authority operator seats.

Each voting seat carries equal weight. Proxy voting is not permitted. Abstentions do not count toward quorum but are recorded in the governance ledger.

Emergency protocol changes, such as revocation of a compromised Root Authority, may be enacted by a simple majority with mandatory ratification at the next scheduled Council session.

Protocol change process

All protocol changes follow a structured lifecycle: proposal submission, public comment period, security impact assessment, Council deliberation, and formal vote.

The minimum comment period is 30 days for standard changes and 60 days for changes affecting the trust model or key hierarchy. No change may bypass the comment period without emergency classification.

Approved changes are published with a minimum 90-day implementation window. Root Authorities that fail to adopt mandatory changes within the window are subject to compliance review and potential tier downgrade.

Certification program

KIFP certification validates that infrastructure components, devices, and integrations conform to protocol requirements. Certification is a prerequisite for participation in the federation at any tier.

Root Authority certification

Validates that an organization's infrastructure, operational practices, and security controls meet KIFP requirements for operating as a Root Authority. Certification includes HSM configuration review, key ceremony audit, and operational runbook assessment.

Infrastructure and operations

Edge Device certification

Validates that edge devices comply with KIFP specifications for secure biometric capture, on-device processing, and SAG generation. Certification covers hardware security module integration, firmware signing chain, and tamper resistance.

Hardware and firmware

Verifier certification

Validates that verifier implementations correctly process SAGs, enforce authorization policies, and maintain audit trails per KIFP requirements. Certification includes protocol conformance testing and integration validation.

Software and integration

Conformance test suite

A comprehensive automated test suite covering all KIFP protocol interactions. The test suite is maintained by KeyIdentity and made available to all certification candidates. Passing the full test suite is a prerequisite for all certification programs.

Automated validation

Discuss governance participation

Organizations evaluating Root Authority status, federation membership, or certification readiness are invited to engage with our governance team for a structured assessment.